Intel Core™2 Quad Q6600, 2.40 GHz 6600 (BX80562Q6600) Boxed Processor

Pros: Quad cores, 8Mb total L2 on-chip cache

Cons: 65nm always produces more heat than a 45nm quad core

The Bottom Line: Four cores in an Intel Q6600 versus two cores in the E8600, which will ultimately win the performance battle on the Socket 775, you make the choice!

Review: In the world of IT, we do not get out very often so our biggest thrills surround the arrival of new hardware. Recently, a new desktop computer from Dell arrived and inside it was the Intel Core 2 Quad, 2.4Ghz processor. The need to benchmark the...

Pros: Can hit 3.5 GHz rock solid stable (YMMV), low FSB and high multiplier (easier OC)

Cons: Bad heatsink mount design, high temperatures (even at stock settings)

The Bottom Line: The Q6600 G0 stepping represents the current sweet spot for price and performance. Just need better cooling.

Review: It's no secret that Intel's current Core microarchitecture is superior than AMD's current K10. It is also no secret that Intel was ready to unveil a 45 m refresh of the Core. The quad-core version would be codenamed Yorkfield. Not only will the die...

Pros: Great for multi-tasking, low price, overclocks very well

Cons: Can run warm, uses more watts compared to the new 45nm chips.

The Bottom Line: A great buy for budget conscious individuals who want peak performance.

Review: This processor is simply amazing. I've been running this chip for about 8 months and haven't had any problems whatsoever.

The stock speed of 2.4Ghz is more than enough for most applications, and even most hi-end games. If you're into...

Pros: Enjoy new levels of performance and personal productivity with the "Q"

Cons: Requires a modicum of knowledge to overclock. Uses slightly more power than dual core.

The Bottom Line: With the price disparity gap between dual and quad core, there simply is no reason to limit yourself. In this case, more is indeed better.

Review: I purchased my G0 Q6600 from ClubIT back in late October, 2007 when the G0's (the new stepping, at that time, versus the older B3 version) were scarce, so I went with a vendor who guaranteed that I would get one (versus the distinct possibility of...

Pros: RUNS PROGRAMS VERY QUICKLY ALLOWES FOR MULTI TASKING

Cons: NONE

Review: THIS PROCESSER IS IDEAL IF U WANT BIG BANK FOR UR BUCK. IF UR A HARD CORE GAMER OR IF U WANT IT TO JUST USE IT AT HOME ITS GREAT FOR ALL OF IT. I HAE THIS ON MY COMPUTER AND MY PC HAS NEVER RAN SO FAST OR RAN SO MANY PROGRAMS. IT ALLOWS ME TO MULTI...